The start of Covid. What came before and after

2019 Hong Kong on fire

I will tell you this today. I listened to Dr. Drew. I listened to him for a few minutes.

But then I lost kind of my patience for a thing and I think his spaces was excellent and the first of his I ever heard.

I think there’s a fundamental flaw when people discuss COVID because most discussions of COVID kind of start in a small sandbox that I don’t think people should be playing in and that is kind of giving it some kind of air of legitimacy and authority. And I think, you know, you have to go back to the very first days.

In fact, the days before Covid and in 2019 when there were all the Hong Kong protests, in fact, there were protests all over the world.

And I’ve indicated this to people before. There were protests in Greece about the immigration problem. and how the EU was paying immigrants rents two years in advance.

So it was driving you know, the, the rental market was skyrocketing with huge increases in rent as the EU bid the prices up, the EU has an unlimited budget and the locals couldn’t compete, they were losing their apts, bad shape, and also, by the way, these were long term leases.

And it was causing, again, a lot of, you know, displacement, a lot of social friction. Germany, you had the rising gas prices, you had the taxes being pushed down, particularly into the agricultural sector, as they were, you know, aggressively going green. In France, you had the yellow vest protest. China had the Hong Kong protests.

In America, we had our own form of protest, although it wasn’t nearly as violent, but I believe it was a lot more cathartic and had much higher efficacy, which was you know, Trump.

He was really an expression of a wage earner revolt.

And so that was probably the most dangerous, you know, to the elites and it really imperiled them, the Plebs had won a huge battle.

So that was 2019, but if you go back even before that, in 2012, 13, 14 15, you had all the protests against the TPP, the Trans Pacific Partnership which in Europe was called TTiP, which would’ve created this kind of intergalactic, legal framework and judiciary framework that would’ve created these offshore banks that would fall outside of any type of regulation and overview and certainly no congressional oversight.

And of course the Al Gores and John Kerrys of the world would have been, you know, the bankers. And as we’ve all learned the hard way from playing monopoly, the banker has an enormous advantage. So there was a worldwide protest about that also.

And in fact Julian Assange in one of his big drops about 2015 gave big insights into the ultra secretive Trans Pacific Partnership.

And what’s more, he also alluded to the Trade in Services Agreement, which we’re now seeing discretely being implemented with no bills being passed and no votes.

All of these things could not at that time have been passed through Congress because there would have been huge protests, so they were looking at these backdoor mechanisms through these treaties and agreements, particularly agreements that they did need to go through a transparent processes, like the Paris Agreement and all these types of things.

So the Trans Pacific Partnership, it’s called the TPP was that type of agreement that could have been, was gonna be brought in very nuanced and with a lot of intrigues. And it was gonna be signed in Australia.

So nevertheless, in 2019, you had all these protests going on in China and in Hong Kong, and around I think off the top of my head, around October of 2019, you had the People’s Armed Police, called the PAP, which is kind of the local police force within China, which is fused with the triad gangs.

The triad gangs are used for their ultra violence.

So they’re used to deploy the violence that the police can’t really deploy on their own. And then they have their own internal you know, infrastructure of violence as well, a hierarchy of violence that they deploy from other triad gangs and, and in a partnership with the People’s Armed Police.

So they had just stormed, I think it was, what was it, hmm, St. George’s University. And when they had done that in Hong Kong the Chinese Communist Party, called the CCP really lost the moral support of the people because there has always been an agreement about the relationship that the Chinese Communist Party would have with Hong Kong and its ability to run somewhat autonomously, not just economically, but also legally autonomously and the broad separation it would have from the Chinese Communist Party and from their kind of coercive measures. So when they stormed the university, it was really a violation, and at that time they really lost all the moral support and in a one party system.

As America’s now approaching, we’re coming to that also where when you have a one party system essentially

It’s almost dynastic and we’re seeing that with the Romneys and the Bushes and the Clintons and, you know, the Bernie Sanders dynasty and you know all the rest of ’em. I’m sure we’ll see a Trump dynasty of some sort.

So when you have these types of dynastic types of things, the problem is when they lose the moral support of the people, the entire political system turns over, and that means all of the wealth that those dynasties have grabbed in all the ways that they’ve infused themselves and embedded themselves into huge Chinese businesses, all gets taken away by the new regime, and the old regime may wind up in jail for whatever.

China losing the trade war and CCP losing legitimacy

So they had lost all the moral support, the people were really revolting against the Chinese Communist Party throughout China. The trade wars were going horrifically for China, if people remember that in 2018, 2019 in the rust belt of China, which is where they make mattresses and AC adapters and all these kinds of low end types of stuff, was operating well below capacity, well below capacity.

The Belt and Road was a complete disaster

and that has a lot to do with, there’s a lot of corruption within the State Owned Enterprises. In China their form of capitalism is stealing from the government. so these quasi CCP enterprises, they’re very corrupt. They use shoddy materials that aren’t going through quality checks, very shoddy cement, shoddy glass, counterfeit tools, etc.

So everything was falling apart. And we saw that in Ecuador where we saw the dam collapse. We saw all of their spaghetti schools and spaghetti railroads that they had built in Nigeria and other countries just completely falling apart, even in Tanzania. And the currency swaps that they were doing with these countries were below market. So countries were actually holding onto these things in their own trade banks, and they were losing a lot of money on the currency swaps. So nevertheless, the Chinese Communist Party was in a lot of trouble.

And I thought that it was very possible that we would see some turnover.

Trump did a small trade agreement with China right at the end of 2019. The reason he did that was to help China pay its debts to American lenders. The world was going through dollar debt denominated, you know, crunch. And China is particularly vulnerable to that because a lot of the debt that they carry is in real estate and its owed to American funds and because they were given dollars, they have to repay in dollars.

And those are three months, six months, 18 month notes. So they turn over really, really quickly. So it’s not like these are 20 year notes like people have on their mortgage.

These are very short-term notes that turn over and constantly need to be refinanced and they need to be serviced in cash.

And a lot of American institutions, BlackRock and Mutual funds, pension funds and private corporations, are holding onto Chinese mainland assets that have been pledged to them and those loans have to be serviced in dollars or else they forfeit. And what you saw happening in 2018 and 2019 was tens of thousands of bankruptcies and regional provinces creating these enormous receivership types of organizations.

You already had Apple and a lot of large American companies that were at the end months and years of fulfilling their long-term contracts with Foxconn in China, other manufacturers, etc.

I tweeted around November of 2019 that I think that China’s only hope, the last chance they have is an absolute blitz of propaganda meant to affect American sentiment. We are an open system, any hostile power can buy ads. Sure enough, three months later, COVID happened.

Going back to the mini trade deal with China

Trump did it because he needed to give China a break and to give them U.S dollars. The risk of default was huge.

Payments due in American dollars, if I recall correctly, was about a trillion dollars due in the early months of 2020, and it’s all dollar denominated debt. And there was a dollar denominated crunch. Unlike in America, a trillion dollars everywhere else in the world is a huge amount of money. And China can’t just go out and print a trillion dollars in American dollars. They can’t even, you know, print renminbi and get other countries to accept it for trade and to service debt. So China was extremely vulnerable.

“Leaked videos” out of China of people dying of Covid

And the protests throughout China stopped, poof. Maybe the protesters all got Covid?

Now, all of a sudden, early, you know, January of 2020 is when there started to be some type of, of indescribable mystery we called COVID-19 and on January 23rd and January 24th on Twitter is when all of the leaked videos started and I was extremely suspicious of them, not just because I had some specialization within, you know, certain little intricacies of China finance and, which gives me some type of a glimpse of their culture. And I, you know, I’ve always had friends you know, within the Chinese Communist Party within, you know, tech and also the children of the CCP members who had high slots in China tech companies and in the US.

And we’ve always kept everything, you know, very respectful because, you know, I’m a nationalist and they’re nationalists. And as much as our interests competed, you know, we also understood that it’s a big boy game and neither one of us are big boys and we’re just trying to live happily.

But of course, you know, we detested each other’s leaders and, and everything else.

But in America there’s a great amount of intrusion by the CCP into finance and technology as well. I don’t think there’s a technology company in the United States that doesn’t have a CCP influence, or some proxy on its board, as its investors or as key employees.

January 23rd, January 24th, all of a sudden on Twitter, I’m seeing all these videos that I’ve kept and I’ve hard copied cos I knew they would be disappeared by twitter in the coming years to erase the evidence of the bot syndicate, the inauthentic activity of the accounts and the total fakeness that caused worldwide panic.

Everybody knows I keep a log of all this type of stuff, and I thought it was absurd.

China is a country of, you know, 1.3 billion people, and 400 million of them are really angry Marxists that detests this iteration of the CCP. Nevertheless nobody likes the Chinese Communist Party except the Chinese Communist Party, which is, you know, I think only about 80 million people. Everybody else is kind of shit outta luck.

So for me to be seeing these videos and for everyone else to be seeing these videos was a Festivus miracle, and I knew it wasn’t possible.

It was because they wanted us to see the videos.

Because if they didn’t want us to see these videos, they would’ve done the Hunter Biden laptop disappearing thing on us. And it would’ve disappeared completely from Twitter. You would not have seen it.

China, the Chinese Communist Party has a term, they call it Discourse Power. And it means something very substantial. It’s a term of their diplomacy with a lot of academic rigor that’s behind it within China. Discourse Power is the way people will be made to discuss China internationally. It has certain parameters of the criticism it tolerates, that’s it.

They use it to kind of extend the control that other countries have and the way they discuss China and even the way the diaspora interacts and talks about China. It’s one of the purposes of the Confucius Institutes and one of the purposes of the United Front, to manage very, very rigid control on what people are saying.

And it’s also, you know, a mechanism to target countries and particularly politicians and a country’s social issues for CCP infiltration.

Nevertheless, January 23rd, January 24th is when we saw all of these leaked videos and you know, everybody became an expert.

And yet none of the information about Covid was pristine.

We were seeing videos because we were permitted to see videos, which I was very, very skeptical of why we were being allowed this kind of, I don’t know the right word, maybe we can call it privilege. Why were we being allowed this kind of privilege to see the internals of China, a country that has such an extreme boundless surveillance network and respects no sovereignty.

So for those videos, not only to have escaped China

but also for them to be shown on Twitter so freely and for them to propagate and for them to diffuse so much is only because this is what Twitter, and maybe it’s pharma advertisers wanted to happen. And it’s what Twitter permitted, such an extreme virality.

And I have no doubt that Twitter was very aware of the inauthentic behavior of the source, and in fact, they were amplifying it. I know for a fact they were amplifying it. And, you know, I’ve been able to kind of do forensics and kind of do like an audit on these things and see kind of the accounts that originated it.

And it’s you know, it was about a hundred accounts that originated this. It was a syndicate of about a hundred accounts, and after that it became people in, you know, the, the United States who then saw the virality of it, wanted to get the clicks for themselves and wanted to, you know, give themselves the lab coats and respectability of scientific and compassionate authority.

Keep in mind that at this time, in early 2020, Greta was treated as this kind of Renaissance figure, the fabled “a child will lead them” character, and I think the Conservatives wanted to have the prestige of being a person of the Enlightenment and being like a modern day Galileo.

So everybody became, you know, a scientist

and all of a sudden everybody was able to watch these leaked videos from China and to perfectly translate Mandarin and all these local dialects into English. And when I would listen to it, or give it to a reliable expert, I, and we, would hear something completely different. But I would see the videos given subtitles, and people, and I don’t wanna mention their names, who would offer their translation, or just reiterate someone else’s MIStranslation, and it was completely wrong.

I would also see videos that I knew were not in China, because I know the way the hospital systems look in there, and I know the way they kind of interact with the populace, you know, within China and medical care, or lack thereof that a middle aged person will get in there.

You know, there’s some subtleties to it, but some of them I was very quickly able to track down to an emergency rooms in Mexico completely unrelated to Covid.

January 23rd 2020 is when they began and by January 24th they were all viral. They were also diffusing from very recent accounts and ones that had basically been created in some instances either by Twitter or with, with Twitter’s knowledge.

They’re what I call vintaged accounts, which is that Twitter has the ability to create accounts and then backdate them to 2009, which is one of their usual dates for backdating them. And then what they’ll do is they can immediately populate them with a timeline. So they’ll be real looking, but they don’t exist in the way back machine because they are also small. So all of a sudden these accounts would pop up out of nowhere, or were existing accounts that were basically dormant and would now be activate, or they had been used for other amplifying stuff in years past. So these things went viral very quickly.

China does large Covid construction projects

And then on January 23rd, I think it was either January 23rd or January 24th, out of nowhere, China comes out with a video of them building hospitals. All of a sudden they were doing these construction projects, and within two days they had these massive facilities.

Which I knew was also impossible to accomplish with that speed, even outside of the ease of not having to deal with environmental groups, unions, zoning and so on.
It looked to me to be the exact same cloak they employed in 2007, 8 and 2009 for the Beijing Olympics and for the World’s Fair.

They used all that construction, all those materials, and all that empty land as a way of cloaking the building of enormous detention facilities that spanned huge swaths all over China.

China has between 1.2 and 1.4 billion people – depending on the day. And they’re fine with getting rid of two thirds of them.

Back to January 23rd, January 24th and within China came out these government videos showing these huge work projects, building hospitals. Building these enormous facilities and people like Balaji and CNN and etc, were all in awe at how quickly they can do this, how amazing it is that they can do this and saying that China can do this because they don’t have to worry about unions and permits and blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.

Pundits say why can’t we be more like China

PBS did a panel discussion on the thing saying how wonderful it was, and all the pundits were saying, why, you know, that we’ve gotta do the same type of instant pop up quarantine facilities and saying things like “Why can’t we do something like this?”

Jim O’Neill praises China government’s virus response: ‘Thank God this didn’t start in somewhere like India’

Jim O’Neill, the chair of U.K. think tank Chatham House, on Wednesday commended the “fast, aggressive” Chinese response to the coronavirus outbreak, suggesting western countries should follow suit.

APRIL 28 2020, NPR: Should The U.S. Follow China's Example Of Mandatory Quarantine Centers?

www.npr.org

And at that time it was Conservatives – and they were now heavily pushing for masks and they were pushing for shutdowns of the economy and quarantines, which I thought immediately was outrageous because it was completely unnecessary and they demanded it so forcefully, and they never demanded any interrogation of the videos, of the reliability of the data, nor did they demand inspection of it and so on.

They were basically trusting China

…the CCP, and nothing that China was reporting had any oversight by any authoritative international health body, not any United Nations entity, nor did the World Health Organization get inside China to do oversight and ask big questions. No regulatory oversight, no international regulatory, no international Hospital Association, nothing. It was all China saying “trust us”.

Meanwhile there was absolutely no oversight on the disposition of the allegedly ill, their treatment, their civil and human rights and the legalistics and so on, or even to the legitimacy or the severity of this thing.

And people remember the videos of people just dropping dead and having these horrible spasms, blah, blah, blah. There was no oversight. It was all just “trust us.” But American and world punditry was, particularly the Conservatives, at that time, very willing to encroach on our civil liberties and saying it was, as the saying goes, “two more weeks”, “exponential”, and transitory.

They wanted the encroachment of our civil liberties, but transitory.

So then in early March it became, you know, the Liberals did that same extremism, and the Conservatives enjoyed “owning the Libs” and screaming that they said it first. They finally started beginning to shy away from the extremism around June/July of 2020.

By July, most of the Conservatives had begin shying away from it and had now gone into the other direction.

But it was too late.

It’s kind of like in those movies where if you, if you invite a Vampire across your doorstep, then they can come into your house, you’re now their prey, that’s the way it goes.
However you wanna allegorically or metaphorically conceive of it, the vampire was in our house and they let it in.

Once you’ve given permission to something like that it can never be revoked, right?

Now you gotta remember that there was no pristine information that we were getting, it was all panic and urgency and “look at the leaked videos”, but there was no information that was reliable. Conservatives and the Liberals wanted to wear masks and demanded that everyone else do the same, even though there’s never been any science to mask wearing and to support their premise and argument, instead they all used the visuals and corrupted history of the Spanish flu outbreak,

Nevertheless, there had never been any proof that masks in any way inhibited the spread.

Lots of Covid deaths, but no autopsies

And there were no autopsies that were being conducted throughout the world. For example in Germany they didn’t permit it and nowhere else did either, because they all collectively said it was too dangerous because the germs would spread everywhere in the autopsy thru aerosol or something, it was crazy.

April, 2020:

So I, I mentioned all this because today I heard Dr. Drew, obviously just a wonderful person and he’s very articulate and he’s very concerned, and that was clear from what he was saying.

The problem is, is that you know, I, I don’t think he’s naïve and I don’t think he’s gonna, you know, go on Twitter Spaces and broadcast his skepticism of how this plays out. I think he looks at it transactionally. Whether he is doing that, you know, just to keep the calm or whether he believes it, I don’t know.

I think he’s looking at the transaction of how we can kind of restore reality.

How can we restore some type of scientific equilibrium and I don’t think that can happen. I don’t think that can happen. It doesn’t make a difference what they say with viruses. It doesn’t. None of this makes a difference.

They never should have shut down a country. There have been plenty of academic papers that conclusively stated that there was no reason going back years before Covid, there historically has never been a reason to shut down international commerce. That there’s been no benefit.

But this was happening throughout the world.

This was happening, you know, right after all the cryptic transmission had already spread the virus. In China in around February of 2020 a mayor in Italy, I think it was Milan maybe, advocating strongly to “hug a Chinese person” and then there was what New York City was doing by telling everyone Covid was not a big thing, this allowed cryptic transmission, it really affected the entire country because NYC is such a tourist destination and transit hub. So there it was, it had already been, it had already spread in its cryptic form as much as it was gonna spread anyway, once it’s out there it can’t be stopped. No big deal.

But even in January, there was never any reason for there to be a pandemic. because, you know, prior to that there had never even been a real definition, never a substantive definition of pandemic.

So I hear Dr. Drew today, and Dr. Drew wants to get back to the science of it and wants there to be some real Socratic type of dialogue. But I am certain that there can’t be because you’re not dealing with people in good faith. You’re dealing with people like Michael Shellenberger – who I’m absolutely certain, although I, I can’t prove it right now, although I strongly believe that there will come a time when I can substantiate it, that he was acting as a paid PR agent to advocate for a collaboration between corporations and government to coerce, in the strongest terms, a total shutdown of America and enormous behavioral demands of people, it was crazy. But he did it, he tweeted it out many, many times in March of 2020, the exact moments that the Liberals made Covid a thing.

Shellenberger’s entire background is in Public Relations and he’s a leftist

His client list and his specialties is activism, they do activism for left clauses, and that means things like community engagement, distortions that work in the favor of his causes, astroturf, and he’s got to become a true believer in the causes that pay his bills.

So there’s no way to deal with these people in good faith. His work with Twitter Files is a PR narrative and frames everything away from his own culpability and Public Relations work, and he doesn’t disclose any conflicts, just like the CCP – he says “trust me.”

And one of the things the Doctor Drew commented on is all the confusion that’s going on in what’s popularly called “the science” of vaccines and quarantines and stuff like that.

And this goes back to the things I’ve said from the start. I said the very purpose of people like Berenson and people like Shellenberger, you, all these other pseudo scientists and MISs credentialed people and the CDC and Fauci and all the rest of them is they want to sow discord.

They can’t outright lie

or say anything that’s actually a lie, because that can be debunked and reverse engineered very quickly, particularly in our open data type of system. And we still do have an open type of system however long that endures for, but, so they don’t wanna say anything that’s explicitly a lie.

So they can’t outright tell complete lies because of how quickly that can be debunked and how, you know, the virality of the debunk would be huge. So what they do is instead of lying, they create confusion. So they wanna have competing narratives, for and against the extremes and
nothing else and no dialog between the two sides is allowed, they want unresolved friction.

The panic was exactly what they wanted, because it immobilizes people, people cannot convene around the truth.

So what Dr. Drew wanted some type of Socratic dialogue, and he said that now that the GOP is at the top of the Judiciary, that there’s gonna be some real fact finding type of investigations and resolutions.

I’m telling you there won’t be – because the GOP is just as complicit in this. Although there have been some GOP politicians that have done good things, and in late 2020, they did come out with a very good report on the timeline of China, WHO and its failures to comply with Article five of what’s called the IHR – and it has a whole checklist that they had to do, but didn’t, it was proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that they failed compliance with Article five, which was something that was created because of the outbreak of 2002 with sars in China and because of the lack of candor of China at the time.

Dr. Drew believes that there can be like some type of an oblivion committee that just forgives

…and does forensics, finds the culprits and then it’s forgiven and the world kind of gets back to some semblance of whatever normal.

I’m certain that it’s not possible because people like Shellenberger and it’s impossible because the corporation will never deal in good faith, there won’t be any deathbed confessions.

Pharma ad spend, what’s all the money buying?

Pharma and healthcare’s digital ad spend to reach $10B next year: report

Digital advertising is booming in pharma and healthcare, and it’s expected to rise to $10 billion in 2020. | Digital advertising is booming in pharma and healthcare, and it’s expected to rise to $10 billion in 2020. That’s according to a new report from PulsePoint, and it represents a 13% increase o…

Pharmaceutical companies have a lobbying group and spend $10’s of millions yearly on lobbyists, many of them are former politicians, and that means they are also spending it on Public Relations firms to promote Pharma interests. And more than that the U.S pharma industry had allocated in 2019 for a $10 billion advertising spend in the United States alone, and this money was for their 2020 ad spend. Remember that the pharma industry does $500 billion annually in the United States alone.

So now, in 2019 they made an ad spend budget for 2020 of $10 billion dollars and the majority of that money was gonna be spent on social media, on Twitter, on Facebook, on Facebook groups, on doctor patient groups and so on.

And, keep in mind that another $5 billion or so was gonna be spent on meetings with doctors to inform them on the kind of pharmaceutical stuff and all the doctor meet and greets and what nefarious things they do.

Leading lobbying industries U.S. 2021 | Statista

In 2020, the pharmaceuticals and health products industry in the United States spent the most on lobbying efforts, totaling to about 357.85 million U.S.

So Facebook is already getting huge pharma money, in fact just like CNN and television does, so in 2019 Facebook knows they’ve got a huge spender coming on in 2020. And Facebook staffed up a team of people to shape the environment for pharma, this is all public record and none
of it is my speculation or wacky theories. It’s in the advertisement industry news like Ad Age.

It’s in early 2019 when Facebook started suppressing anti vaccine discussions and expressions of questions and dissent, even shutting it down from private messages.

I just had this conversation with Mike Cernovich

on Twitter on Twitter cos in 2019, being that he lives in a very vaccine pushing state, he was very active as a journalist reporting on the anti-vax movement just as a reporter, essentially showing what was going on in California with kids.

In 2019 there was an anti-vaccine movement as Pharma became more aggressive and obliging politicians were demanding new laws and regulations that forced kids to vaccine to the max and the media was completely embellishing the ferocity of the parents’ protests, it wasn’t a national deployment of resistance, it was actually very localized and orderly as these things go, it was very localized, community oriented and was really just a bunch of moms. There was no ferocity to it, but you know, it was amplified by Facebook in such a way that they had cover for using censorship to shut it down.

So in 2019 is when Facebook started doing dry runs on how to shut down dissent to appease their advertisers and to shape the environment in Facebook to be Pharma friendly.

And then we have 2020 and in January is when Covid became a thing.

March 7, 2019: Facebook to target vaccine misinformation with focus on pages, groups, ads

So I don’t think we can ever get to resolve this and to be able to restore any sense of equilibrium or any sense of whatever justice might be, depending on how you view the responsibilities of justice, whatever that might be, there won’t be justice.

Forget about a Constitutional restoration

…or any type of emotional or intellectual equilibrium that allows people’s brains to relax and get back to a normal state of logic and reasoning.

This can’t be stopped until people can deploy the same type of brute force that has been used against us.

It’s an asymmetrical war that most people don’t even know, or care, that is being fought against them.

BLM was obviously this inorganic, well funded huge brute force movement to show who the boss is, this is the way new regimes put away the old. And that needs cruelty and spectacles and so it goes, you have to know that its cruel and “don’t let this happen to you”.

Shellenberger and his ilk and industry

…is never going to say if he had any conflict of interest in terms of his own PR shop getting funded, who funded it and what the terms of the contract are, for example: whether the philanthropic and very Leftist Pritzker family that’s really into transhumanism and all this type of stuff, they’ve been one of his biggest funders, and we have no idea how much they’ve impacted what he says and does. PR agents do PR agent things

So that’s about it. I talk so much.